|
Let's see how Obama
answers the questions put forward to him regarding his
planned killing of Osama:
Why
killed Osama?
The first edition:
Osama "was engaged in a firefight with those
that entered the area of the house he was in" (John
Brennan).
The second edition:
Osama "was not armed." (White
House spokesman)
Why
killed Osama's wife?
The first edition:
Because she was used by Osama as
a "human shield" so she was killed.
The second edition:
She was not used as a
"human shield" but tried to shield her husband
from killing squad's bullets so she was killed.
The third edition:
She was not killed at all.
Were
the U.S. administration informed the killing?
The first edition:
Yes, top officials watched the show
from the beginning to the end through a video feed and "had
real-time visibility into the progress of he operation." (John
Brennan)
The second edition:
No, "there was a time period
of almost 20 or 25 minutes that we really didn't know
just exactly what was going on." (CIA chief)
Can
you provide any photos, a part from the fake ones, to
prove Osama was killed?
The first edition:
We'll release the photos (Obama).
The second edition:
No, we
"decided" not to release any pictures (Obama).
Why
dumped Osama's body at sea?
The first edition:
In accordance with Islamic traditions
and customs.
The second edition (after
condemnation from Muslim theological leaders):
Avoid the creation of a "shrine".
The third edition:
Osama's brand of Islam calls for
unmarked graves.
The following answers
are also challenged but yet to be upgraded to a new version
by the White House:
Why
the answers keep changing?
The answer:
Because there are big holes in the
initial answers due to the
"fog of combat"
The hole in the answer:
If there is no fire fight, where
the "fog" came from?
Did
Osama mastermind 9.11?
The answer:
Yes.
The hole in the answer:
Osama denied his involvement and
Taliban once offered to hand over Osama to U.S. if the
White House could provide credible evidences to prove
there is a link between the two. But to this day there
is none from either Bush or Obama. Remember U.S. regime
also accused Sadam of being behind 9.11 that
is part of the reason to invade Iraq. Wonder, which head
of a state and the sovereign rights of a nation will
be the next to come under the blood smeared knife of
U.S. butcher in the name of 9.11? And the next, the next,
the next …? Until all America's foes and competitors
are eliminated?
Is
Al-Qaeda behind the most terrorist activities in the
world?
The answer:
Yes.
The hole in the answer:
According to the White House, Osama,
as the head of Al-Qaeda, is the most valuable source
to crack that terrorist network, which is the excuse
they put forward in order to interrogate Osama's wives
currently under Pakistani custody, yet Obama's man deliberately
cracked Osama's head with bullets at close range after
this unarmed man in sleeping gown was apprehended by
a band of armed warriors, thus the most valuable source
of information was destroyed. Why?
Is
the claim made by Al-Qaeda that there are nukes in the
Europe that will be detonated if Osama was assassinated
true?
The answer:
Don’t' know.
The hole in the answer:
Then what makes Obama so confident
that the killing of Osama will not put the Europe under
nuke attack? Is it because he knew right from the beginning
that it was a lie? Or because he actually can't wait
to see the Europe to be nuked?
Prev: An American Coup
Next: Questions on Osama's Killing
|
