| Home >> World
Watch |
The
Hands That Pushed, Are Pushing and Will Keep Pushing
America Into Israel's Wars (4) |
| 11
November 2011 |
| |
|
Viewer's comment:
USStateSponTerrorism:
For us Americans to continue thinking that we live in a
Democracy and that our votes control how we will be governed,
IS JUST STUPID! We have foolishly allowed a foreign government,
that is ... ..., to take over our economy, our foreign policies
and our politics. It's time we brought them all to JUSTICE!
Below is the except of
an article written by Stephen J. Sniegoski published on thornwalker.com titled The War on Iraq: Conceived
in Israel:
How did the 9/11 terrorist attack lead to the
planned war on Iraq, even though there is no real evidence
that Iraq was involved in 9/11? From the time of the 9/11
attack, neoconservatives, of primarily (though not exclusively)
Jewish ethnicity and right-wing Zionist persuasion, have
tried to make use of 9/11 to foment a broad war against Islamic
terrorism, the targets of which would coincide with the enemies
of Israel.
To understand why Israeli leaders would want
a Middle East war, it is first necessary to take a brief
look at the history of the Zionist movement and its goals.
Despite public rhetoric to the contrary, the idea of expelling
(or, in the accepted euphemism,
"transferring") the indigenous Palestinian population
was an integral part of the Zionist effort to found a Jewish
national state in Palestine.
However, Segev continues, the Zionist leaders
learned not to publicly proclaim their plan of mass expulsion
because "this would cause the Zionists to lose the world's
sympathy."
The key was to find an opportune time to initiate
the expulsion so it would not incur the world's condemnation.
The opportunity to grab additional land occurred
as a result of the 1967 war; however, that occupation brought
with it the problem of a large Palestinian population. By
that time world opinion was totally opposed to forced population
transfers, equating such a policy with the unspeakable horror
of Nazism.
Since the 1967 war, the major question in Israeli
politics has been: What to do with that territory and its
Palestinian population?
It was during the 1980s, with the coming to
power of the right-wing Likud government, that the idea of
expulsion resurfaced publicly. And this time it was directly
tied to a larger war, with destabilization of the Middle
East seen as a precondition for Palestinian expulsion. Full
article at.
Reader's comment:
split:
“50 percent of the prominent neocons surrounding the Bush
administration were Jewish” – The percentage of Jewish warmongers
pushing for war in open letters to Pres. Clinton and Bush
is much higher.
[1] [2] [3] [4]
Prev: Whose Coffins Are These?
Next: U.S. Ambassador to China Implicated
in a Debt Scandal
|
| |
| |
|
 |
LATEST ENTRIES
Why China Lagged Behind
in the Recent Centuries?
The article veals a t ruth that many serious researchers
have already known for ages but the general Chinese public was prevented
from knowing by some certain forces.
New Year 20122
Everlasting Sorrow
Rebuplican
2012 Presidential Debate
The Hands that Pushed US into Israel's
War
Israel's
Nuclear Program and WMD
Chongqing, a City for 99%
Why
the 1% in US Cannot Not Go to War?
How
Manchu Collaborated with Aliens
Paper
Tiger Bites
Wall Street and its mouthpiece have now launched
a campaign to discredit OWS Movement. The New York Times dug
up an article published on the Adbuster 7 years ago that
revealed the Jewish background and Israel links of many warmongers
in the Bush administration. The magazine was thus accused
by the New York Times of being anti-Semitic. Abduster's
reply to the accusation, however, was refused to be published
in full on the NYT. What a tyranny of media dictatorship
in US.
The following are some
comments left by viewers on mondoweiss.net regarding the event:
Taxi:
I like Asbusters [Anti-Semitism Buster]. LOL!
What a great opportunity
this is to ‘water down’ further the perfidious and malicious
accusation of anti semitic by zionist gangbangers whenever
the subject of justice for Palestine is brought up.
I think Mr. Lars should use
his publication to launch a full-scale-assault campaign against
the wretched and nefarious zionist media. Expose after expose,
ridicule after ridicule and humiliation after humiliation –
a continuous and expanding ‘War of Ideas’ in our nationwide
media!
I also advise Mr. Lasn to
sue the pants off his accusers and fast! I’d love to have the
definition of anti-jewish/anti-semitic open for discussion
in the courts and also to more of the public. I’d love for
the public to understand the difference between judaism and
zionism: learn it like they had to learn(?) the difference
between sunni and shia in the last ten years – well at least
they know THERE IS A DIFFERENCE between them, confused as they
maybe about the details.
Chaos4700:
It doesn’t help that we have
people like Witty and hophmi and DBG insisting that
their loyalty to the “Jewish nation” is more important than
their status as American citizens.
HRK:
We all deserve to know that
60 – 80 percent of the Democratic Party’s funding comes from
Jewish sources, many of whom are very pro-Israel.
Lasn is absolutely correct
to publish statistics on Jewish involvement in the neocons
and the neocon/neolib involvement in getting us into war.
Because really who cares?
The public is so over the anti semitism hysteria of the zios.
All the OWS anti
semitism clap trap is about is Israel Firsters trying to
destroy OWS because they and Israel can’t afford for the
US government to get cleaned up or out.
Chaos4700:
True, and fewer and fewer
people are taking the NYT seriously now. Remind me, where
were they on the invasion of Iraq, way back when?
James:
i can’t understand why anyone
even bothers with the nyt… isn’t it obvious the nyt and the
wapo are hopelessly slanted news outlets that don’t
serve the interests of the public, but only their owners own
agenda??
|
