Dr. Xiao Chuanguo

我认识肖传国博士很多年了，以我对他的了解，我认为他是一个非常好的人，一个心怀慈悲的内科医生，一个技术高超的外科医生，一个实事求是的研究人员。肖氏外科手术的科学依据最初是通过动物实验得出的，随后发表在专业期刊上经同行评议。后又经过多年的研究和实验方运用于人体。我们为此做了前瞻性研究评估这一方法，并制订了有效的研究规则。肖博士与我们全程合作，参与了研究规则的制定，也明白这些规则将会公开发表。他没有试图隐瞒他的任何研究结果或其它有关信息。美国的内科医生们和科学家们认为他是一个非常值得尊敬的同事。

而方先生则不同。他被指控在他发表的文章中剽窃别人的研究成果并被肖博士抓住现行。他于是利用一切机会不惜所有代价报复肖博士。这使人不得不对关于肖先生指使人袭击他的指控打个问号。若说像肖先生这样地位的人会雇佣一帮白痴锤击方先生然后再主动回去束手就擒，这实在是太不合常理了。要是他真的是主使人，他难道会不知道他的同伙落网了并选择远走高飞吗？？肖博士是个极为聪明极有智慧的人，这样拙劣的袭击案决不能出于肖博士之手，而一定是另有隐情。

I have known Dr Xiao for years and in my opinion, he is a good man, a caring physician, gifted surgeon, and an honest investigator. The scientific basis for his surgical procedure was initially developed in the animal laboratory and the results published in peer reviewed journals. Only after years of research was it applied to humans. We have been involved in a prospective study to evaluate this procedure and have constructed a valid research protocol for this project. Dr Xiao, has been involved with the deveopment of the research protocol and has cooperated fully with us and understands that the results of this study will be published. He has not tried to hide any of his research results or any other information. He is considered by the physicians and scientists in the United States as a respected colleague.

Mr Fang, on the other hand, is an individual who is reported to have published research that was not his, and was reportedly called on it by Dr Xiao. He has conducted himself as a man seeking revenge at all costs and has tried to discredit Dr Xiao at every turn. One has to wonder if these claims of assault are real or imaginary. It makes no sense for a man of Dr Xiao's stature to hire some fools to punch Mr Fang and then return to China sometime later to be arrested. If he had hired someone for this task, wouldn't he have known that they were arrested prior to his return to China from Argentina and avoided arrest?? Dr Xiao is a brilliant man, and this reported assault attempt seems to be the work of a fool, not Dr Xiao.