Multiple
Texts > World Watch
29 May 2010
By Admin
Analysts Question Korea
Torpedo Indicent (2)
分析家们质疑南朝鲜鱼雷事件
The
Following are some comments from viewers:
steve_k2：
I thought this sounded
fishy from the start. It's another
trumped up Golf of Tonkin incident.
Considering that the north has nukes,
this is crazy.
这事看来确实有猫腻，和海湾战争时的技俩有得一拼。可这回是北朝啊，人家有核武，这不是疯了吗.
ccarrick1:
I would like to see our
intrepid reporter check out the 6 May
Reuters story in which a Yonhap story,
citing an unidentified senior South
Korean source, discusses a topic I have
seen nowhere else:
"The metallic debris
and chemical residue appear to be
consistent with a type of torpedo made in
Germany, indicating the North may have
been trying to disguise its involvement
by avoiding arms made by allies China and
Russia, Yonhap quoted the official as
saying."
Why did someone high up in
the South Korean government tell the
South Korean media that the torpedo was
identified as of German make? The North
Koreans have none in their
inventory--though they could have
acquired some, no doubt. But could they
be fired from a NK submarine?
Interestingly, the entire South Korean
submarine component is composed of
German-made submarines, Type 214s and
Type 209s. Wonder if the South Koreans
could have somehow inadvertently hit
their own ship and then tried to cover it
up.
请注意以下这段发布于五月六号的路透社的报道。其中提到对一位未提名姓的南朝鲜有来头人物的访谈。该人物说：
“鱼雷的金属碎片和化学残迹与德国制鱼雷上的一致，这似乎说明北朝想掩盖鱼雷的真正产地，或者是中国，或者是俄国。"
你说你脑残的南朝鲜政府干嘛要告诉南朝鲜媒体那枚鱼雷是德国造的呢？全世界的人民都知道北朝鲜没有德国货 – 当然他们从哪儿弄到一两枚那也是有可能的，但它们的非德国配制的潜艇能发射德国鱼雷吗？另一方面，全世界的人民都知道，南朝鲜的潜艇整个都是德国装置，214系列，209系列。鬼知道南朝鲜舰队是不是因为内讧而自相残杀，然后嫁祸于人逃避罪责。
Torpedo：
Can you say....Gulf of
Tonkin.
And even if the facts are
as stated, I wonder if the americans
would have responded any differently if
some unfriendly naval power was
conducting naval exercises within
disputed american territorial waters.
当初海湾战争的翻版啊。
退一万步，即使鱼雷真是北朝鲜发射的，那又怎么样？要是哪个不友好国家派战舰到有争议的美国附近海域耀武扬威，你看美国发不发鱼雷。当然发。
Prev:
South Korea
Calim Questioned (1)
Next: Did U.S.
Mine Sink SKorean Ship? (1)
.
|
