List China Events Chinese Culture China Watch Chinese Music Land of China Chinese Festival Chinese History Chinese Architecture Chinese Medicine People in China What Chinese Say Martial Arts China Tales World Watch World Beyond Amusing & Musing


Home >> What Chinese Say

Chinese Comments on Korean Crisis (3)

27 December 2010
 

东方日报:

Using war to regulate domestic economy and using armed force to sustain a financial domination in the world is the time-honoured game of the United States. This round Washington keeps stirring troubles in the East Asia serves its objective of channeling the flow of hot money, destabilizing the economic balance in the region and reversing the trend of RMB internationalization.

Which is why when China is doing everything within its power to resolve the confrontation in the Korean Peninsula, South Korea government, with the encouragement of US and the help of another US puppet regime in Japan, has rejected peace talk out right and chose a military path. Since US is so determined to play with fire in front of China gate, the only option left for China to pacify the situation might be to take up the challenge and let the fire burn until the US core interest has also been damaged.

用战争调控经济,用军火维持金融霸权,这是美国惯用的战略,正所谓,大炮一响,黄金万両。今次华府不断在东北亚搞事,主要是用军事手段调控热钱走向,破坏地区经贸平衡,遏制人民币国际化,确保美国金融霸权牢不可破。

中国想方设法平息事态,但韩国作为美国半殖民地,对美国百依百顺,不断与北韩制造摩擦,而日本也秉承美国旨意,在钓鱼岛问题上不断向中国发难,令东北亚局势一波未平,一波又起,成为世界热点。中国惟有用挤脓疱之法,以大乱达到大治,美国既然要乱,就乱到让美国核心利益也受损。

抄出智慧:

Recently there are almost daily reports on TV news about China’s military development, although just lasted fleeting seconds each time. Today is about the successful launch of Beidou 7 - now the framework of the Big Dipper has taken shape. We are doing the things at a speed 10 times faster than the US. The numbers of third generation warplanes start to catch up, as well as tanker aircrafts and early warning systems, whilst the battleships are built in the yards as quick as the dumplings to be made in the kitchen. Our ground force is not there taking a snooze either. In terms of the equipments – we now have nearly all that US armies possess, and the number of those things increases rapidly, like EMP system. Over the years, the US uses information warfare to bully the small countries around the world. Without it, its ground force worthes almost nothing, really.

最近看新闻,几乎每天都有中国各类演习的几秒镜头,今天北斗7又打成了,北斗7星总算有了个架子了。军事准备在切实的推进,新东西在按照时间表推进,那可是一年赶10年的进度,空军3代战机的数量不知不觉已经上来了,加油预警也上来了,海军的军舰下饺子一样出,出来就是数个航母战斗群,陆军也没闲着,美军有的俺们基本都有了,数量也在不断增加,强电磁环境下信息化体系作战等等,这些年的战争老美向来欺负弱小,剥去了信息化的外衣,美国陆军剩不了什么了。

邋遢道人:

If I were Barak Obama and want to contain China, I definitely wouldn’t pick North Korea as a place to start my military venture.

The biggest disadvantage in this scenario is that it would galvanize the alliance between three countries in the former Communist camp. The current South Korean military provocation in disregard for the international criticism can be easily read as a sign that the three countries in the opposing camp, namely USA, South Korea and Japan, have already come up with a military decision to invade North Korea. In this case, China and Russia will re-forge an alliance to counter the US camp – there is no way the pair will sit back doing nothing watching the fire of war to burn into their own backyard.

I bet this will be the only result that South Korean’s military provocation generates, that is to help Russia and China to work together to fight back. What US will do? Take further military action against China and Russia? Three giants are all armed with nukes, who will be bold enough to take the first strike? As you can see, the more trouble South Korea creates in the region, the more harm it does to the United States.

I’m not here to offer my advice to Obama in his war against China. If I can see that, his administration has certainly seen that too, but they still go down the wrong path, which means they are fated doing so.

Those “experts” in China’s central television station have a knee jerking reaction over US military power. If US is really so smart, how come it would invade Iraq that costs US fortune with no real return? How come it would start Korean War and Vietnam War only to get defeated?

To be honest, I don’t think in China there is a distinction between Rightists and Leftists. China only has two kinds of people: traitors who collaborate with foreign powers and patriots who defend national interests. When you examine the issue from this point of view, many things become crystal clear.

贫道要是奥巴马,而且想遏制中国,肯定不会选朝鲜这个地方发生冲突。

在这个地方冲突的最大坏处是,完全可能让俄、中、朝重新结盟。这几天韩国不顾国际舆论执意做“挑动性军事演习”,很容易让中国和俄罗斯认为前些时美日韩三国在美国开会实际做了个联合军事侵略朝鲜的协议。六方会谈,三方搞个军事联盟,剩下三分会舒服吗?如果美日韩真的对朝鲜动武,中国和俄罗斯会看着不管?不可能!因为这直接牵涉这两个大国的地缘政治利益和国土安全。因此,在这个地方闹事,最大可能就是让中苏重新结盟,别的什么结果也不会有。军事威胁中俄?狗屁!三个核大国谁敢对别人动手?既不是中国的要害点,又可能让中俄走到一起,动作越大,帝国利益损害越大。

贫道这样分析,不是给美国支招。因为假如贫道说对了,奥巴马班子也该想到了。既然美国没这样做,走的是臭棋,告诉他们该怎么办也没有用。假如贫道说的不对,反正也造不成对中国的损害。

总之,不要以为美国智囊班子有多聪明。现在看央视很多专家们一说美国,就战战兢兢,动辄就是人家考虑有多精细。美国考虑那么精细,怎么去占领伊拉克,最后啥便宜也捞不到?美国智囊班子真那么精细,怎么会在朝鲜战争,越南战争在方向上都错了?

说实话,中国无所谓左右,只有卖国和爱国之分。把握这一条,什么都看清楚了。

[1] [2] [3]

Prev: Zhou Libo's Quotes
Next: Princess IV - PLAAFJ20

 
 
RELATED:

Sun Tzu Art of War:

凡战者,以正合,以奇胜

In all battles, be honest and upfront in order to unite your own force; be peculiar and eccentric in order to break your enemy's strength.

以治待乱,以静待哗,此治心者也。

Keep your discipline and stay in calm, await the moment when your enemy is in trouble and disarray - this is the art of dealing with heart.

以近待远,以佚待劳,此治力者也。

To be near the target while your enemy is still far from it; to wait at ease while your enemy is toiling his way across. - This is the art of managing the strength.

无邀正正之旗,无击堂堂之陈,此治变者也。

Refrain from intercepting your enemy who is in perfect order; avoid attacking your opponent who is at composed position. - This is the art of coping with circumstances.


Home List About This Website Contact Us

Copyright © 2008 - 2017